Voss v. Scott
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Plaintiff, claiming a rescission by mutual consent of an exchange of real estate, had a verdict against defendants for the value of the property with which she had parted. At the trial there was a separate controversy arising on the cross-complaint of defendant Inez Schultz against her codefendants. With that we are not now concerned. The present appeal is by the defendants other than Inez Schultz from an order denying their motion for judgment or a new trial.
There is much and irreconcilable conflict in the evidence. That ior plaintiff is easily believable and now confirmed by the verdict.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Cash Register Co. v. MerriganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Adan v. SteinbrecherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- Finkelstein v. HenslinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Van Metre v. NunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Pinger v. PingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norlander v. CronkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Hassman v. First State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- American Guaranty Co. v. Sunset Realty & Planting Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1944
- Kallusch v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931