Norlander v. Cronk
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Plaintiff, Anton H. Norlander, instituted this action in the Washington County District Court to rescind a warranty deed he had executed conveying a farm to defendants, James Cronk and his wife Gretha Cronk. The case was tried before the court and an advisory jury. Rejecting the jury’s finding to the contrary, the court found that defendants had exerted undue influence to obtain the conveyance. The only issue presented by defendants’ appeal from the judgment is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the trial court’s finding that such undue influence was practiced upon…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Fischer v. SperlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Ashton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Prescott v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Shevlin v. ShevlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Naeseth v. HommedalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Asleson v. West Branch Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Asleson v. West Branch Land Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Banner Life Insurance Company v. BultmanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- In re Estate of: Alice I. Engman, Decedent.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017