Legal Opinion

Pinger v. Pinger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the district court for Scott county, Edson, J., presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

Upon the complaint and answer in this case judg-' ment of dismissal was ordered and entered, upon defendant’s motion. Two grounds were assigned therefor: First, that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; and, second,' for want of reply to the answer. The object of the action is to cancel and set aside a deed, with its record, of certain real property,! made by the plaintiff to her son, the defendant. The complaint alleges the plaintiff to be a widow, over 80 years of age at the time of' the transaction, and very feeble and infirm. It further sets forth…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bruer v. BruerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Agner v. BournSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Kramer v. MericleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
  4. Voss v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API