Legal Opinion

United States v. Bondy

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 1, 1963No. 16,340PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

This case is before us on certificate of The Judge Advocate General of the Navy, bringing up for consideration the jurisdiction of the board of review to review the accused’s conviction.

Bondy was tried jointly with Private James T. Kempenar by a special court-martial on two specifications of unauthorized absence and wrongful appropriation of a motor vehicle, in violation of Articles 86 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 886, 921, respectively. Both were found guilty as charged. Evidence was then introduced to show Kempenar had been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. WhitmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  2. United States v. LovettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. WilsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. PayneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. BestUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BevilacquaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. Robison v. AbbottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API