Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Lombardo

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 21, 2002No. 1:99-cv-00095PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

WILLIAM C. LEE, Chief Judge.

On March 11, 1999, Plaintiffs Connie Lombardo nee Ragle 1 (hereinafter “Ra-gle”) and Steven Myron (hereinafter “Myron”) filed the present action against the defendants, John Lombardo (hereinafter “Lombardo”), John Doe, and Jane Doe, 2 alleging violations of Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (hereinafter “Title III”) and its Indiana equivalent, Ind.Code § 35-33.5-5-4. Ragle and Stevens allege that Lombardo illegally intercepted, disclosed, and used Plaintiffs’ wire, oral, or electronic communications.

P…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Indira ADUSUMILLI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Johnny McClendon Jr. v. Indiana Sugars, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Katie R. HARDIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S.C. JOHNSON & SON, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewton Ex Rel. Lewton v. DivingnzzoDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API