Legal Opinion

Randall v. Dudley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1897PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Wilber, J. Assumpsit by Robert M. Randall against Fred A. Dudley on an account stated. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The Cross Lumber Company was a corporation organized under tbe laws of this State. In May, 1892, an agreement was made between the Cross Lumber Company and defendant, by the terms of which the Cross Lumber Company was to furnish the capital to be used in the business of buying and selling shingles, etc., and defendant, Dudley, was to manage the affairs of the concern, and the profits and losses were to be equally divided. The business was conducted under the name of F. A. Dudley & Co., and was continued until the spring of 1894, when F. A. Dudley & Co. stopped doing business, closed out the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Button v. HoffmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. FrankIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In re MoserMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Rough v. BreitungMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ruttle v. What Cheer Coal Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Robinson v. TaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API