Legal Opinion
Mosel Vitelic Corp. v. Micron Technology, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided March 24, 2000No. CIVA 98-449-GMSPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SLEET, District Judge.
On February 8, 2000, Micron Technology, Inc. (“Micron”) filed several motions in limine in this action for patent infringement. In its fifth motion, Micron asks the court to impose a sanction against Mosel Vitelic Corp. and Mosel Vitelic, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Mosel”) because the initial drafts of the opinion letters which serve as the basis for Mosel’s advice of counsel defense were destroyed after patent counsel met with the litigators to revise them. As a result, Micron argues, it is not possible to determine whether these opinions…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lefteri Poulis and Athena Poulis, His Wife v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- John W. Wilson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc., a New York Corporation and Volkswagenwerk, A. G., a Foreign Corporation, Wolfsburg, Western GermanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Comark Communications, Inc. v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Inmuno Vital, Inc. v. Telemundo Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2001
- Simmons, Inc. v. Bombardier, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Akeva L.L.C. v. Mizuno Corp.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.