Legal Opinion

Whittaker v. Todd

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 2006No. COA05-361PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Alec Whittaker (“plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his action for monetary damages for defective installation and workmanship of a porch roof on his residence. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.

The pertinent factual and procedural history is as follows: On 22 January 1991, plaintiff contracted with Robert W. Todd d/b/a/ Southern Exteriors (“defendant”) for defendant to replace the porch roof at Whittaker’s home. The written contract provides: “All workmanship guaranteed for as long as you own home; materials as specified by manufacturer.” While painting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamb v. Wedgewood South Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Tipton & Young Construction Co. v. Blue Ridge Structure Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Haywood Street Redevelopment Corp., Inc. v. Harry S. Peterson, Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pga W. Residential Ass'n, Inc. v. Hulven Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Trillium Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Trillium Links & Village, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. KB Aircraft Acquisition, LLC v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. Roemer v. Preferred Roofing, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  5. Glens of Ironduff Property Owners Ass'n v. DalyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API