Legal Opinion

Markowitz v. Liebert & Obert

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided August 23, 1945PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Btteling, C. C. J. and S. C. C.

The plaintiff instituted an ’ action at law, sounding in tort, based upon the negligence of the two defendants against whom the suit has been brought jointly and in the alternative. It is alleged by the plaintiff that he went to the place of business of the defendant Samuel Frankinstein, trading as City Beverage Co., for the purpose of purchasing a case of defendant’s Liebert and Obert beer known under the trade name of Cooper’s Beer, and that while on the premises of the said defendant Samuel Frankinstein, in the City of Atlantic City, County of Atlantic and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  3. Cleary v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1938
  4. Noonan v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  5. Hochreutener v. PfenningerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sociedad de Gananciales v. Presbyterian HospitalSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963
  2. Alston v. JL Prescott Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  3. Román Rodríguez v. La Mueblería Central ComercialSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1951
  4. BORNSTEIN EX REL. BORNSTEIN v. Metropolitan Bottling Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. Community Partnership v. Presbyterian Hospital of San JuanSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API