Legal Opinion
BORNSTEIN EX REL. BORNSTEIN v. Metropolitan Bottling Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided June 17, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
45 N.J. Super. 365 (1957)
132 A.2d 825
JEROLD BORNSTEIN, AN INFANT, BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, AND SIDNEY BORNSTEIN, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
METROPOLITAN BOTTLING COMPANY, INC., A CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 8, 1957.
Decided June 17, 1957.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.
Mr. James J. Langan argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Emory, Langan, Lamb & Blake, attorneys).
Mr. William A. Davenport argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Payne v. Rome Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Harpell v. Public Service Coordinated TransportSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- Bradley v. Conway Springs Bottling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941
- Oelschlaeger v. Hahne & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- MacPherson v. Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ferrell v. Sikeston Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
- Francois v. American Stores Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Kahalili v. Rosecliff Realty, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Benton v. StichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Bornstein v. Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1958