Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Duffy

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1942PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SciieNCs:, ■ J.

We are constrained to hold that the judgment entered by the Superior Court is in error, for the reason that the provisions made for the future wife or wives of Francis Stringer Duffy, Jr., as well as the provisions made for the unborn child or children of the said Francis Stringer Duffy, Jr., by the deed of trust and the will of the late Francis Stringer Duffy, are more liberal than the provisions made for the said wife or wives or for the said child or children in the trust agreement alleged to have been entered into by the interested parties in being and in said judgment.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Penick v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Deal v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Redwine v. . ClodfelterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Trustees of Watts Hospital v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. RasberrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Wachovia Bank & Trust Company v. BuchanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. Brooks v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API