Legal Opinion

First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Rasberry

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 16, 1946PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The appellant concedes that the trust estate, due to its heavy debt load, is in a precarious financial condition and that it would be to the advantage of the cestuis que trustent to sell a part of the trust estate to raise funds with which to reduce the indebtedness and thus make the profitable operation of the farm land possible. He admits that the contingent remaindermen are interested in all other lands held in trust in the same way and to the same extent as they are interested in the land proposed to be sold; hence, the application of the proceeds of the property sale to the payment of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penick v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Johnson v. WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Johnson v. . WagnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Duffy v. . DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Duffy v. DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wachovia Bank and Trust Company v. JohnstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Greer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
  4. In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  5. Brooks v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API