Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Roberts

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 19, 1929PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

The motion to dismiss the appeal in this case, which was made subsequently to the enactment óf Chapter 11890 Laws of Florida 1927, was deferred until the final hearing and the appellees appeared by counsel and filed a brief.. The decree appealed from is erroneous in so far as it allows a solicitor’s fee -of $3,100.13. There was no evidence to show that the complainants had agreed to pay their solicitor such sum for his services in the cause. See H. J. Brett v. The First National Bank of Marianna, decided at the present term. -In other respects the decree should be affirmed.

It is ordered that…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mallard v. EwingSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Curry v. Wright, Sr.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. Holmes v. DunningSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Vieno v. Fields Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931
  5. Peppercorn Et Vir. v. BenciniSupreme Court of Florida · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API