Legal Opinion

Krystoff v. KALAMA LAND CO., LTD.

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 1998No. 20557PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATANABE, Judge.

The major issue 1 raised in this appeal from a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants Richard M. Krystoff and Mayumi L. Krystoff (collectively, the Krystoffs), proceeding pro se, is whether Defendant-Appellee Kalama Land Co., Ltd. (Kalama) was entitled to enforce a lease rent arbitration award even though it failed to confirm the award in court within one year of the date of award, as permitted by Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 658-8 (1993).

We agree with the First Circuit Court (circuit court) that the arbitration award was enforceable. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Sverdrup Corporation v. Whc Constructors, Incorporated, and Century Iii, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
  3. Spearhead Construction Corp. v. BiancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. Beall v. Board of TradeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. State of Maryland Central Collection Unit v. GettesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Metcalf v. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES'BEN. ASS'NHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cabatbat v. County of Hawai'i, Department of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Metcalf v. Voluntary Employees' Benefit Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API