Krystoff v. KALAMA LAND CO., LTD.
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WATANABE, Judge.
The major issue 1 raised in this appeal from a declaratory judgment action brought by Plaintiffs-Appellants Richard M. Krystoff and Mayumi L. Krystoff (collectively, the Krystoffs), proceeding pro se, is whether Defendant-Appellee Kalama Land Co., Ltd. (Kalama) was entitled to enforce a lease rent arbitration award even though it failed to confirm the award in court within one year of the date of award, as permitted by Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 658-8 (1993).
We agree with the First Circuit Court (circuit court) that the arbitration award was enforceable. Accordingly, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Sverdrup Corporation v. Whc Constructors, Incorporated, and Century Iii, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Spearhead Construction Corp. v. BiancoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Beall v. Board of TradeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- State of Maryland Central Collection Unit v. GettesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2010
- Metcalf v. VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES'BEN. ASS'NHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- Cabatbat v. County of Hawai'i, Department of Water SupplyHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
- Metcalf v. Voluntary Employees' Benefit Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2002