Legal Opinion

Oesterreich v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1904No. Docket No. 117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Anna M. Oesterreich against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. There was judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This action is brought to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff while walking over a defective sidewalk in Biddle street, in the city of Detroit. The circuit judge directed a verdict for the defendant on the ground that the plaintiff was shown by her own testimony to be guilty of contributory negligence.

The first question for consideration is, therefore, whether the plaintiff’s own testimony conclusively shows that she took a risk which no ordinarily prudent person would have taken under the circumstances, or neglected that care for her own safety which the law requires. Her testimony…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Vergin v. City of SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Tattan v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of YpsilantiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Swanson v. City of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Barribeau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Maryon v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API