Tattan v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Catherine Tattan against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant on verdict directed by the court, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
This is an action for personal injuries. The sole question presented in the case is whether the plaintiff served a notice upon the corporation counsel such as is required by the amendment to the charter of the city of Detroit, being section 46 of chapter 11 of the charter, as amended. This section reads as follows:
“No action shall be brought against said city, nor any of its boards, commissions, or officers, for any negligent injury, unless it be commenced within one year from the time when the injury was received, nor unless notice shall be given in writing, within three months from the time…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brown v. Town of SouthburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Brown v. City of OwossoMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Wheeler v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Wilton v. City of FlintMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Lord v. City of SacoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
3Cited by20 opinions
- Ridgeway v. City of EscanabaMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Barribeau v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
- Sweet v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1913
- Larkin v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Oesterreich v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.