Legal Opinion

Maryon v. City of Atlanta

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1919No. 1059PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Question certified by Court of Appeals (Case No. 9685).

1Opinion of the CourtFish, C. J.

The Court of Appeals desires instruction from the Supreme Court upon the following question involved in this case: “In order to comply with section 910 of the Civil Code of 1910, requiring that a claim in writing be presented to the governing authority of a municipality before suit to enforce a demand for 'money damages’ on account of injuries to person or property, is it essential that any particular amount of money as damages shall be named or specified therein?”

As this question must, in our opinion, be answered in the negative, such answer will necessarily cover the other questions…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Johnson v. City of Bay CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Cloughessey v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
  4. Barrett v. Village of HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Morgan v. City of LewistonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Scearce v. Mayor of GainesyilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. West v. City of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  3. Jones v. City of AustellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. Aldred v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  5. City of Rome v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API