Legal Opinion
Claim of Ennist v. Texaco, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 1, 2001PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed December 14, 1999, which ruled that claimant had no compensable lost time and denied her claim for workers’ compensation benefits.
Claimant sustained a work-related injury to her back in November 1994 but lost no time from work as a result thereof. In September 1996, claimant was laid off from her employment due to economic conditions. Based upon medical evidence of a partial disability as a result of the work-related injury, claimant sought workers’ compensation benefits for reduced earnings subsequent to the layoff. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Claim of Benesch v. Utilities Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Coyle v. Intermagnetics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
3Cited by7 opinions
- Claim of Rothe v. United Medical AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Claim of Turetzky-Santaniello v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Millner v. CablevisionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Walby v. Volt Information ScienceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Thompson v. Saucke Brothers Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.