Legal Opinion

Matter of Hunt

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1997No. COA96-1364PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Respondent offers three arguments in support of his contention that the trial court erred by terminating his parental rights. For the following reasons, we believe there is no merit to any of respondent’s assignments of error.

We note preliminarily that respondent failed to comply with several provisions of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure in preparing his record on appeal, most notably Rule 28(b)(5). Failure to comply with Rule 28 subjects the appeal to dismissal. Northwood Homeowners Assn. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 112 N.C. App. 630, 436 S.E.2d 282 (1993). Because…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of PierceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. NORTHWOOD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re P.L.P.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. In re M.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. In re J.D.S.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  4. In re T.L.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Matter of HuntCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API