Legal Opinion

State v. Drumhiller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 26, 1984No. 5237-1-III; 5294-0-IIIPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

Following a bench trial, Thomas Stewart and Mark Drumhiller were convicted of possessing a controlled substance — cocaine. They appeal, contending the evidence against them was obtained as a result of an unlawful search and seizure. We affirm.

The evidence and the court's finding to which no error has been assigned reflect the following facts. On April 17, 1982, at about 12:45 a.m., the Yakima Sheriff's Department received a telephone call from a citizen who believed that a neighbor's residence was being burglarized. He reported that he saw an unfamiliar car parked in the driveway and two men…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. State v. SeagullWashington Supreme Court · 1981

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bower v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. State v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Sayre v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API