Legal Opinion

Hill v. Warden

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 10, 2021No. 1:21-cv-00444Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND LOUIS HILL, III, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No.: RDB-21-444 WARDEN, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION In response to the above-entitled Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, Respondent asserts that the Petition should be dismissed because some of the claims raised are procedurally defaulted and all of the claims lack merit. ECF 13. Petitioner Louis Hill, who proceeds pro se, has filed a Reply addressing the procedural default issue. ECF 17. After review of the pleadings filed, this Court deems a hearing…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API