Lea v. Young

(dissenting) — In their complaint in the prior action, respondents, after alleging the agreement for the sale from respondents herein to these appellants of the real property which is the basis of this action, alleged that these appellants had made default in the payments which they were to make pursuant to the contract, and that respondents had notified appellants that, unless appellants placed the contract in good standing, respondents “would elect to cancel said contract and terminate all of defendants’ rights in said property and in said contract of purchase.” Respondents prayed that the…