Legal Opinion

Janice Abele v. Arnold Markle

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 13, 1971No. 279, Docket 71-1605PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANSFIELD, Circuit Judge:

Appellants, 858 women, brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging the constitutionality of that State’s anti-abortion statutes, 1 requesting that a three-judge district court be convened pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2281 and 2284, and seeking a permanent injunction against enforcement of the statutes. Federal jurisdiction was invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1343(3) and (4)'. Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s dismissal of their complaint and refusal to convene a three-judge court. We…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. McInnis-Misenor v. Maine Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. Jennie McCormack v. Mark HiedemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. McRedmond v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API