Legal Opinion

Poesy v. Closson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1962No. 9078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover on a promissory note for $300.00 executed June 10, 1957, payable with 6% interest one year after date, and for a reasonable attorney’s fee in case of suit for its collection. Defendant answered, claiming the note was executed without any consideration, and set forth a cross-claim for damages, allegedly resulting from a breach of the provisions of the written lease executed by defendant as landowner, and by plaintiff as tenant. This lease was for a term of four years from March 15, 1954, and among its terms, provided that upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phipps v. Boise Street Car Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Miller v. BelknapIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Burns v. SkogstadIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Saccomano v. North Idaho Shingle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. D & M DEVELOPMENT CO. v. Sherwood and Roberts, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Koron v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Spacemaker, Inc. v. Borochoff Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Santillanes v. Property Management Services, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Kelly Choi Ent., Inc. v. Tenjudo, Inc.Superior Court of Guam · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API