Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Alders

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1978No. Docket Nos. 17473, 17744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HALVONIK, J.

Appellants challenge the legality of searches and seizures conducted at their residence. Appellants Kaufer and Alders entered pleas of guilty to charges of violating Health and Safety Code section 11366 (maintaining a place for the distribution and use of heroin). Appellant Garrison entered pleas of no contest to a charge of violating Health and Safety Code section 11351, subdivision (a) (possession of heroin for sale) and a charge of violating Penal Code section 12021, subdivision (a) (felon in possession of a concealed firearm). Prior to their plea, appellants moved to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Russi v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. People v. TricheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. People v. IcenogleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. People v. GarberCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. David L. Harper, United States of America v. Adrian A. HarperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. BrittonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. People v. VeronicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. People v. TidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API