Legal Opinion
People v. Garber
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 25, 1969No. Crim. 7344PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMolinari, P. J.
Defendants appeal from judgments of conviction following trial by the court. All three defendants were convicted of bookmaking (Pen. Code, §337a, subd. 2); of conspiracy to obtain telephone service by fraud (Pen. Code, § 502.7, subd. (a), 502.7, subd. (b)); of conspiracy to commit the offense of unlawful use of telephone lines and equipment (Pen. Code, § 591); and of conspiracy to illegally wire tap. (Pen. Code, § 640.) For the reasons hereinafter stated, we have concluded that the judgments must be affirmed.
Facts
A multi-frequency signal generator or “blue box” is a device designed to enable…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Carol Ann Goldstein, United States of America v. Toby RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- People v. MangieficoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- People v. GarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. ShipsteadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.