Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 5, 2008No. 18219PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

957 A.2d 874 (2008)

289 Conn. 904

STATE of Connecticut

v.

Philip MITCHELL.

No. 18219.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided September 5, 2008.

James M. Ralls, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in opposition.

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 108 Conn.App. 388, 948 A.2d 335 (2008), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's statement was admitted in violation of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. MitchellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API