Legal Opinion

Thoele v. Thoele

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1929No. Docket No. 29PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

Respondent filed her action for divorce in the court below upon the grounds of extreme cruelty. Appellant filed his answer in which he specifically denied all of the allegations of extreme cruelty. After a trial the court granted respondent an interlocutory decree of divorce, from which appellant took this appeal.

Appellant presents several assignments of error, but they contain quite the same questions of law and fact and may be consolidated under two heads, namely, that respondent’s amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and, therefore, that the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. Barnes v. BarnesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. MacDonald v. MacDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Andrews v. AndrewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Fleming v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ungemach v. UngemachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Scheibe v. ScheibeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Corporation of America v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Sehabiague v. SehabiagueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API