Legal Opinion

People v. Charley Quong

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 5, 1935No. Crim. 176PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLYN, J., pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction on the charge of possession of opium and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. For reversal he depends upon, the insufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction and upon an affidavit of one Yee Haw, filed in support of his motion for a new trial, wherein said Yee Haw states that he was the guilty party and that defendant had no knowledge that the opium was on his premises.

There is ample evidence to support the jury’s conclusion that the defendant is guilty. He was arrested on his premises in company with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. RandolphCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  2. People v. LedbetterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. GoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. People v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. People v. GarrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. People v. ShoalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API