Legal Opinion
Duggar v. Mobile & Gulf Nav. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 17, 1932No. 1 Div. 708PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
If it be conceded that the Act of Congress of March 4,1915, § 12 (38 Stat. 1169), had the effect of repealing the limitation upon the Act of Cong. June 7,1872 (17 Stat. 262), which was provided by the Act of Cong. June 9, 1874 (18 Stat. 64), as was held in Burns v. Fred L. Davis Co. (C. C. A.) 271 F. 439, and that such repealing statute continued in effect until the adoption of the present United States Code, that concession does not show error in the result reached by the Court of Appeals of Alabama in this case.
As pointed out in that opinion, by the adoption of the United States Code by Act…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co. v. ByrneSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Burns v. Fred L. Davis Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Waterman S. S. Corporation v. BrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- United States Steel Corp. v. WoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1958
- Migliaccio v. CappolaCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
- Bloomingdale Bros. v. ButlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
- Waterman S. S. Corporation v. BrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942