Dayton Coal & Iron Co. v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. The facts, which involve the validity of tariffs of rates filed with the Interstate Commerce Commission by carriers and of charges made by such carriers, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Day
The Dáyton Coal and Iron Company, Limited, hereinafter called the Dayton Company, filed its bill in the Chancery Court at Chattanooga, Tennessee, seeking to enjoin the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, generally known as, and hereinafter called, the Southern Railway, from prosecuting a certain suit in the United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of Ohio, brought by the Southern Railway against the Dayton Company tcf recover upon certain shipments of iron ore which it was alleged had been shipped, at a tariff of 70 cents per ton, being 10 cents more per ton…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. C. H. Albers Commission Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- United States v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
3Cited by23 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arizona Grocery Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wilson v. City of Long BranchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Burke v. . Union Pacific R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.