Legal Opinion
The Morris Plan Co. v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 5, 1940No. Civ. 11315PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.
The plaintiff was awarded judgment against the defendant in an action brought to recover a franchise tax for the year ending December 31, 1936, claimed to have been illegally collected from it. The defendant has appealed from the judgment. The plaintiff was incorporated under the Industrial Loan Company Law (Deering’s General Laws (1937), Act No. 3603), hereinafter referred to as Act No. 3603. The controversy involves the proper interpretation of the provisions of chapter 13 of the Statutes of 1929 and the acts amendatory thereof, hereinafter referred to as the Franchise Tax Act. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Minnesota v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Hodge v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- First Nat. Bank of Shreveport v. Louisiana Tax Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- State v. ConklingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- The Pacific Co., Ltd. v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- H. A. S. Loan Service, Inc. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hammond v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Crown Finance Corp. v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.