Crown Finance Corp. v. McColgan
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Plaintiffs were successful in the trial court in these actions to recover franchise taxes paid under protest. The actions were consolidated for trial.
The trial court found that each plaintiff, a corporation, was engaged solely in the business of purchasing conditional sales contracts and accounts from neighborhood retail dealers in personal property consisting chiefly of household furniture and furnishings, and with respect to plaintiff, Crown Finance Corporation, also clothing. The latter corporation will be referred to herein as Crown. The taxes were levied on Crown for the years 1937,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- First National Bank of Hartford v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Minnesota v. First National Bank of St. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Tradesmens National Bank of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- General Electric Credit Corp. v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Marble Mortgage Co. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Citrus Belt Savings & Loan Ass'n v. California Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Grange Mutual Life Co. v. State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.