Legal Opinion

Charles A. Burton, Inc. v. Durkee

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1954No. 33913Published

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

One of the assignments of error made by the owners is that, even though the contract between the parties was on a cost-plus-fixed-fee basis, it contained a maximum limitation clause of an approximate amount of $27,000, plus a fixed fee of $2,700; that such limitation should be recognized; and that a cost-plus builder whose claimed costs are disputed should be limited to recovery of the reasonable cost of the work done.

The question of the interpretation of the character of the contract and the rights and the obligations of the parties thereunder was before the Common Pleas Court, the Court of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Norwood v. McDonaldOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Tresise v. AshdownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Union Supply Co. v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Kennard v. PalmerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Knott v. Moore-Lamb Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API