Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2015No. ED 101728PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge

Introduction

Appellant Ronald Tucker (“Tucker”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following a partial ev-identiary hearing. Tucker was found guilty, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and two counts of first-degree child molestation of two victims, B.M. and G.M., and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. This Court upheld Tucker’s convictions and sentence on direct appeal in State v. Tucker, 367 S.W.3d 674 (Mo.App.E.D. 2012). Tucker subsequently filed a Rule 29.15 motion alleging…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  5. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. John Marshall v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. McGuire v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Phillip G. Payne v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API