Tucker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Appellant Ronald Tucker (“Tucker”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief following a partial ev-identiary hearing. Tucker was found guilty, following a jury trial, of one count of first-degree statutory sodomy and two counts of first-degree child molestation of two victims, B.M. and G.M., and sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. This Court upheld Tucker’s convictions and sentence on direct appeal in State v. Tucker, 367 S.W.3d 674 (Mo.App.E.D. 2012). Tucker subsequently filed a Rule 29.15 motion alleging…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- John Marshall v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- McGuire v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- King v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Phillip G. Payne v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.