McGuire v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtKurt S. Odenwald, Judge
Introduction
Brandon McGuire (“McGuire”) appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.151 motion for post-conviction relief. McGuire’s post-conviction motion asserted fifteen claims of ineffective assistance of counsel against defense .counsel. On appeal, McGuire argues that the motion court clearly erred in denying five of those ineffective-assistance claims. Under Strickland v. Washington,2 McGuire bore the burden to demonstrate that.defense counsel’s performance was constitutionally ineffective and "that McGuire was prejudiced thereby'. We are not firmly convinced that any of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zink v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- State v. ShurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- John Marshall v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Jason C. Voss v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Steele v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Esters v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Dwight Moore v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.