Legal Opinion

Leo Kee v. Wah Sing Chong

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1903No. 4272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County. — Hon. Leandeb H. Pbatheb, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

— This is an action upon an attachment bond, brought by appellant against respondents. The cause was tried before a jury, and a verdict returned in favor of appellant for $300. A motion for a new trial interposed by respondents was granted on the ground, as stated in the order of the court, that the action was prematurely *679brought. From the order granting a new trial this appeal was taken.

The only error assigned is that the court set aside the verdict and granted a new trial on the ground that the action had .been prematurely brought. The defense that the action was prematurely…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fiore v. LaddOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Smith v. . HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Hickey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Porter v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Grand Lodge, Independent Order of Free Sons of Israel v. OhnsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API