Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Ortiz
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided March 23, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AVERT, P. J. (W. S.)
The parties are referred to in the briefs as “Appellants” and “Appellees” but from a court of law they are more generally referred to in this Court as Plaintiffs-In-Error and Defendants-In-Error.
The case comes to this Court from the law court of Shelby County, Division II, the Honorable John W. Wilson, Judge. It is brought to this Court by the original defendants in the lower Court, and unless these companies are referred to individually by the specific name, they will be referred to herein with the same status they had in the lower court, “defendants”, and the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Davis v. Farmers Co-Operative Equity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- W. D. Lawson & Company and Washington General Insurance Company v. Penn Central Company and Fort Worth & Denver Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- Beautytuft, Inc., Jorges Carpet Mills, Inc., and Moccasin Bend Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Factory Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- J. Polk Smartt and Isabel Smartt v. Coca-Cola Bottling Corporation (Sued as Cincinnati Coca-Cola Bottling Co.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- Gillis v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Beautytuft, Inc. v. Factory InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.