Legal Opinion
Beautytuft, Inc. v. Factory Insurance
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided October 11, 1968No. 5293PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge.
This cause of action is before the Court upon the following motions, listed in the order of their filing: (1) the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action or to quash the service of process by substituted service through the Commissioner of Insurance of the State of Tennessee, (2) the defendant’s motion to dismiss the action for lack of venue, (3) the defendants’ objections to interrogatories or motion for a protective order with regard thereto, and (4) the defendants’ motion to dismiss this action or to quash the service of process by substituted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beautytuft, Inc., Jorges Carpet Mills, Inc., and Moccasin Bend Carpet Mills, Inc. v. Factory Insurance AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Gallaher v. Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1973
- Barker v. GREENSTREET FINANCIAL LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002