Legal Opinion
Aleut Corp. v. Tyonek Native Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 9, 1984No. Nos. 82-3434, 83-3711PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SNEED, Circuit Judge:
Several village corporations, organized under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), sought on two occasions to intervene as a matter of right in litigation between the ANCSA regional corporations. The district court denied the two motions to intervene. The plaintiffs-intervenors, the village corporations, appeal the denial of the motions to intervene. We affirm.
I
FACTS
ANCSA distributed the title to public lands in Alaska to twelve native regional corporations, approximately 175 village corporations, and other entities. The regional corporations were given both…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corp. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 1981
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. State Of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- State ex rel. Napolitano v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Tyonek Native Corp. v. Cook Inlet Region, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Aleut Corporation, and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation v. Tyonek Native Corporation, Applicants for Intervention-Appellants, Aleut Corporation, and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation v. Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation, Applicant for Intervention-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.