Legal Opinion

Aleut Corporation, and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation v. Tyonek Native Corporation, Applicants for Intervention-Appellants, Aleut Corporation, and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation v. Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corporation, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 9, 1984No. 83-3711Published

1Opinion of the Court

725 F.2d 527

ALEUT CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees,

v.

TYONEK NATIVE CORPORATION, et al., Applicants for

Intervention-Appellants,

ALEUT CORPORATION, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,

and

Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees,

v.

UKPEAGVIK INUPIAT CORPORATION, Applicant for Intervention-Appellant,

Nos. 82-3434, 83-3711.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1983.

Decided Feb. 9, 1984.

Douglas F. Strandberg, Sourant & Strandberg, Anchorage, Alaska, William D. Temko, Munger,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. 16 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1089, 16 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 8164 Maria Alaniz v. Tillie Lewis Foods, Robert Beaver, Applicant-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Chugach Natives, Inc. v. Doyon, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. Aleut Corp. v. Tyonek Native Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Ukpeagvik Inupiat Corp. v. Arctic Slope Regional Corp.District Court, D. Alaska · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API