Legal Opinion

State v. 91st Street Joint Venture

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 9, 1993No. 125, September Term, 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

For reasons to be stated in an opinion later to be filed, the Order of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City dated September 25, 1991 is hereby vacated; further proceedings in that court are hereby stayed pending determination of the litigation in the Circuit Court for Worcester County entitled Department of Natural Resources v. 91st Street Joint Venture, Case No. 91CV0804 SP49/69. Costs in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City and in this Court to be paid by the appellee. Mandate to issue forthwith.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., and ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, McAULIFFE, CHASANOW, KARWACKI and…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Keyser v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
  3. Watson v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. A. S. Abell Co. v. SweeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Preston v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. Maryland Commission on Human Relations v. Downey Communications, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Waicker v. ColbertCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Crofton Partners v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  4. Hanover Investments, Inc. v. VolkmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API