Read Mach. Co. v. Jaburg
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by the Read Machinery Company against John Jaburg and Hugo Jaburg, copartners as Jaburg Bros. On motion for supplemental injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
[1] Defendants are now selling a machine in which, in place of a vertical screw for raising and lowering the bowl, there is a chain which is operated by a train of reducing gears and other mechanisms, some of which are not material to this present motion. The invention patented being for a combination (whether of old or new elements is 'not now material) so arranged as to unite in producing a novel and useful result, it is the combination which will be protected, and the essential point is: Does the defendants’ substituted mechanism for raising and lowering the bowl come…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hoyt v. HorneSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Cimiotti Unhairing Co. v. American Unhairing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1902
- Kinloch Tel. Co. v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bryant Electric Co. v. Reno Sales Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1926
- Gates Rubber Co. v. B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1930
- Triangle Kapok Mach. Corp. v. Solinger Bedding Supply Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1925
- Read Mfg. Co. v. Hobart Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920