Legal Opinion

Cuban-American Sugar Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 1, 1939No. 43206PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

Upon the facts disclosed by the record it is clear that the 'plea in bar must be sustained and the petition dismissed. .Plaintiff made application for the determination and commutation of its profits tax for 1917 under the special assessment provisions of section 210 of the Revenue Act of 1917. 'The Commissioner allowed the application, computed the tax accordingly, and made a final determination in respect of that year. Thereafter, in 1927, plaintiff filed a claim for refund which, so far as it was rejected, related entirely to the matter of special assessment and the selection of com*224parative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heiner v. Diamond Alkali Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Sugar Land Ry. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  3. Welch v. Obispo Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. United States v. Bertelsen & Petersen Engineering Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Central Iron & Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cobb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  2. Cumberland Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1952
  3. Stelco Holding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Newport Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1945
  5. Basch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API