Legal Opinion
Pete v. Jarrell and Arlie Junior Mick v. Ford Motor Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1964No. 8964PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORTHROP, District Judge:
In this case the Ford Motor Company was charged with negligently failing to install a compression washer on the retaining pin assembly of the front left control arm of a 1958 Ford automobile. Appellants, Pete V. Jarrell and Arlie Junior Mick, contend the absence of this washer caused the left front wheel to lock while rounding a curve on Route 14 in Kanawha County, West Virginia. The automobile, driven by Jarrell, went over an embankment injuring both Jarrell and Mick. From a verdict for Ford Motor Company they appeal.
Appellants’ first argument is that the undisputed…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Tennant v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Bonnie Lee Jamieson Deveny, B.N.F. Frank Jamieson, and Frank Jamieson v. Rheem Manufacturing Company, Robertshaw Fulton Controls CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Critzer Et Ux. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Henry Tresvant, IIICourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Schultz v. ButcherCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Fred Collins v. Straight, Inc., a Florida Corp., Licensed to Do Business in the State of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Gebhardt v. Wilson Freight Forwarding Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
- Havee v. BelkCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.