Legal Opinion

Baackes v. Blair

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1936PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. Plaintiff is the owner in fee simple of lot 7, section 29, township 40, range 8 east, Vilas county, Wisconsin, a government fractional lot shown on the original government plat to have as- its entire eastern boundary the shores of Lake Content. Defendant is the owner in fee simple of government lot 8 in the same section, shown on the original govern*85ment plat to have as approximately the west half of its northern boundary the regular subdivisional or eighth line, and as the east half of the north boundary the shores of Lake Content. The situation, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. SmaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  3. Wisconsin Realty Co. v. LullWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Whitney v. Detroit Lumber Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Blatchford v. VossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brody v. LongWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Erickson v. WickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  3. Kind v. Vilas CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Weaver v. KnudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State Commissioners of Board of Public Lands v. ThielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API