Legal Opinion
Techtmann v. Howie
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 5, 1998PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION PER CURIAM:
Appellants are before this Court seeking review of the April 27, 1998 order of the trial court denying the appellants’ Petition for Leave to Join an Additional Defendant. The appellees have filed a motion to quash the appeal as interlocutory. The issue is whether this order is properly on appeal. After careful consideration, we find this appeal is not from a final order nor is it permitted by statute, and thus we are compelled to grant the motion to quash.
Procedurally, it appeai-s from the record that on February 15, 1995 appellees Richard and Monica Techtmann instituted an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Redevelopment Authority of Cambria County v. International Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Pace v. Thomas Jefferson University HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Continental Bank v. Andrew Building Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- McGourty v. Pennsylvania Millers Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Liberty State Bank v. Northeastern BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Forrester v. HansonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. SchmidtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation v. HodesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Stivers Temporary Personnel, Inc. v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Moore Motors, Inc. v. BeaudrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.