COLORADO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY v. Sammons
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VOIGT, Chief Justice.
[¶1] The district court granted summary judgment to an insured on its contract claim against its insurer after a fire loss, granted summary judgment to the insurer on the insured's emotional distress claim, and denied summary judgment to both parties on the remaining claims. We will reverse the summary judgment based upon the contract claim because genuine issues of material fact exist. The summary judgment based upon the emotional distress claim was not appealed, and is not, therefore, before us for review. The summary judgment denials were not final appealable orders…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cathcart v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Higgins v. Insurance Company of North AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Hess v. North Pacific InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Lee v. LPP Mortgage Ltd.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. W.N. McMurry Construction Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Moroney Body Works, Inc. v. Central Insurance Cos.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
- Garcia v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2011
- Shaffer v. WinHealth PartnersWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.