Legal Opinion

Dahlin v. Fraser

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 15, 1939No. 32,174PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff had a verdict for assault which was reduced by the trial court. Defendant claims that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict and that there was misconduct of the jury.

On March 12, 1938, defendant Fraser, who was president of the defendant Ugda, Inc., had plaintiff, who was employed by the corporation, come to his private office and notified her that she was discharged from such employment. Some discussion ensued as to the reasons for the discharge, in the course of which plaintiff claims that Mr. Fraser became very angry and used profane language.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  2. Noonan v. . LutherNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Eckerd v. WeveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Cullen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
  5. Keane v. ButnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Johnson v. MorrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. State v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Thomsen v. RossDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API