Legal Opinion

Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 23, 1998No. 97-1729PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVergeront, J.

Duane and Sharon Jorgensen, shareholders in Water Works, Inc., appeal the summary judgment against them in favor of the corporation and the four other shareholders: Doreen and James Barber, and Gary and Mary Tesch. The Jorgensens contend that the trial court erred in deciding the motion for summary judgment before a receiver was appointed and they had the opportunity for discovery, and also erred in dismissing these claims: direct claim for breach of a fiduciary duty to them as minority shareholders; derivative claim (dismissed without prejudice); claim for judicial dissolution of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grams v. BossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Baker v. Commercial Body Builders, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Rose v. SchantzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Fix v. Fix Material Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. John R. Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc. and Robert F. BaurSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Polk v. Hergert Land & Cattle Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Reget v. PaigeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. Rechsteiner v. HazeldenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API